How it Works
Free to use, this brilliant new public opinion web site allows you to name, shame and claim against any company or individual that has ripped you off or wronged you in any way, leaving you out of pocket or aggrieved.
www.CanYouTrustThem.com uses the enormous power of the internet, social networking & national media, to name and shame on a national scale, bringing swift justice without the cost, time & stress that is associated with a legal challenge. Simple and FREE to use, your story /complaint will be posted for the world to see warning others of your experience, allowing them to compare and comment on their experiences. The site will alert you when the company or individual has made contact to settle your claim or complaint, when fully satisfied with your settlement you can then remove your claim from the register.
Power to the people.
www.CanYouTrustThem.com also uses clever search ranking technology to ensure that any complaints made about a specific company are extremely transparent to any potential customers.
Whenever a potential customer searches the internet to obtain information on a particular company, they will be confronted with the canyoutrustthem.com web site, listing all the complaints for that company - and very often, the canyoutrustthem.com web site link appears at the top of the search listing, even above the companies own web site!!
EG. www.CanYouTrustThem.com received numerous complaints for a company called Cencion Communications and now, whenever a potential Cencion Communications customer searches the company name in Google, the www.CanYouTrustThem.com web site (listing all their complaints) ranks at the very top of the Google search. Since the launch of CanYouTrustThem.com, Cencion communications has gone into bankruptcy proceedings.
Latest complaints
| Company | Claim Title | Added | Posts | Add comment | ||||
| PARCEL2GO.COM [BOLTON] Total claims:4 | PARCEL2GO.COM REFUSES TO ALLOW ITS CUSTOMERS TO UN-REGISTER FROM THEIR SITE( DO NOT REGISTER WITH THIS COMPANY AND PROTECT YOUR IDENTITY ) » | 04/12/2008 | 0 | |||||
I HEREBY FILE A FURTHER COMPLAINT AGAINST PARCEL2GO.COM BECAUSE OF HOW THEY HANDLE THEIR CUSTOMER'S PERSONNAL/FINANCIAL DETAILS AND I WOULD THEREFORE ADVISE ANYBODY THINKING OF USING... | ||||||||
| PARCEL2GO.COM [BOLTON] Total claims:4 | PARCEL2GO.COM AND ITS APPAULING CUSTOMER SERVICES ( AVOID USING THIS COMPANY ) » | 04/12/2008 | 0 | |||||
| PARCEL2GO.COM [BOLTON] Total claims:4 | PARCEL2GO.COM REFUSES TO DELETE MY PERSONAL DETAILS AND CLOSE ACCOUNTS. ( DO NOT REGISTER WITH THIS COMPANY ) » | 04/12/2008 | 0 | |||||
I HEREBY FILE A FURTHER COMPLAINT AGAINST PARCEL2GO.COM BECAUSE OF HOW THEY HANDLE THEIR CUSTOMER'S PERSONNAL/FINANCIAL DETAILS AND I WOULD THEREFORE ADVISE ANYBODY THINKING OF USING PARCEL2GO.COM ... | ||||||||
Latest comments
Claim: Satellite system rip off »
[04/12/2008] Tariam Staff: David harding is Simon Clifton!!!
The following members of staff Mark Luker, Sherif Akil, Thomas Yeomans, Amy Tuffrey, Ned Ward Fincham and Cedric T and Melissa are all ready to talk to anyone who wants to know more about tariam if anyone wants to discuss!!!
Claim: deposit cons »
[04/12/2008] Katie: Hi there, I totally understand how you feel with the awful treatment you have had from Morgan Butler. We own a property underneath one they are managing agents for. We had a noise complaint due to new tenants moving in. The owners live in NZ, and I had had no response from them, I left in Morgan Butlers hands and was told they also were getting no reponse, this went on for months, whilst we were still living with the noise problem, believing that wooden floors had been laid as the noise levels had changed so much between the previous tenants and the new ones. I finally told Morgan Butler I would contact the owners parents to ask them to pass the message on, as Morgan Butler were no longer authorised to call the parents. Within two days the landlords had got in contact, they had not received my email, and my call to the parents was the first they new of the complaint. Therefore Morgan Butler had not infact tried to contact them at all. I was then passed on to Rosalind Dodd, who was unbelievably unprofessional, taking the whole complaint out of context, antagonising the situation with the tenants, then accusing us of making noise. We then thought the best option, as Morgan Butler where not helping, was to soundproof our ceiling, Morgan Butler then did everything they could to make sure it was as diffcult as possible for us to do the works, saying we were breaching working ours instead of trying to resolve the situation. Claiming that she had spoken to enviromental health and they were watching us, a claim which was a lie as the department had no such information on us or our address. Between this time the adjoining fence owned by upstairs had been damaged by bad weather, MB arranged for it to be fixed but used panels at different heights, when I complained she said that they could not find panels the same size and landlords said it was fine...Finally the tenants then moved out, new tenants then moved in again, which ar eno problem what so ever, then a neighbour the other side complains of rubbish in the garden managed by MB, and asked me speak to the tenant as they were not in when she tried herself. On doing this the new tenant told me that she had asked MB to remove the rubbish as it was left by the previus tenants and that she had also informed them of other things within the flat but they had not done anything about it so she gave up. I contacted MB to tell, they accused us of putting the rubbish there and then told me I own the fence that they replaced and called me a demented women!!...previously we had looked at the plans as we had to replace out own fence panels, I got these out again and told Ms Dodd that she should not discuss matters that she does not have the corrrect information for, as the fence is the repsonsibilty of the landlords not us. She had gone on the word of another neighbour who adjoins the property managed by MB on the to other side. I had copied the landlords in on all correspondence, at this point I beleive they felt this was getting out of hand so we arranged a call between ourselves to which we established that they had never disputed the ownership of the fence, they did not know the fence panels were odd sizes and had not said they were ok, that they too had asked MB to just remove the rubbish, that they had not had the call for the noise complaint until I called the parents, we then decided that I would deal with the landlords direct from now on as everytime I tried to deal with MB I was attacked. I myself work in property which I made clear to MB and that I had never ever experienced a company so unprofessional, mainly Ms Dodd. There is much I could put here but don't feel it neccesary, I think I have said enough to ensure you that you were not in the wrong it was the bad handling of MB. She too told me she had recordings of me, which is illegal to use unless she stated at the time she was recording me, which she didn't, also if she had, she would have heard herself being in the wrong. I sypathise with you deeply as our realtionship also suffered with the stress and sleepless night, making us feel we did not want to be in our own home. Ms Dodd sent letters by hand, delieverd by a man at 9.30pm at night making me feel uneasy. She tried accusing us of not getting on with our neighbours which is totally unfounded as my partner is alway helping out with jobs they need doing if he can. I hope you and your partner can work it out and not allow this women to distroy you any further. she is a nasty dangerous lady who will push you to make a wrong move and as you have unfortunately found out will proscute!...We no longer contact Md Dodd, should they be any problems with the property or tenants will contact the owners defeating the object of them being managing agents!
Claim: Satellite system rip off »
[04/12/2008] David Harding: Word has it that one of the reasons the company has had issues is because the afformentioned Ned Ward Fincham has actually been defrauding customers by raising false invoices with incorrect bank details on, as in his and not the company's
Claim: Deposit Taken - »
[04/12/2008] David H: Yes,word has it that one of the reasons the company has had issues is because the afformentioned Ned Ward Fincham has actually been defrauding customers by raising false invoices with incorrect bank details on, as in his and not the company's.
Claim: BAD PRODUCTS »
[04/12/2008] David Hughes: I can fully understand this persons complaint. However, the problem he has experienced with his Samsung products is related to the optical out from his TV when connected to his Samsung home theatre system. Samsung did an OAD (over air download) to correct this problem, they did several over Christmas 2007 and in early 2008 to update the DTV software to 1014. This did cure the problem but if the TV wasn't connected to a terresteral aerial and a channel on mux 1 tuned in, then the update wouldnt happen. Samsung in their wisdom will not supply service departments with this software, as they did do for previous versions, saying that they prefer the OAD method. This causes problems with service departments when the update is required. However, the onus must be on the manufacturer of DTV freview recievers to make sure by OAD or service downloads for service departments that software is available for their sets that are less than six years old. What can a service department do if the manufacturer wonn't supply the software?